Jan Choinski vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the last six months, Karl Choinski has won 43.56% of points on his second serve, while Adrian Wayenburg has achieved a slightly higher 45.25%. This comparison is pivotal as second serve performance often correlates with overall match prediction accuracy. Additionally, Choinski has saved 53.13% of breakpoints, narrowly outperforming Wayenburg, who has a breakpoint save rate of 51.08%. These statistics are instrumental for in-game betting strategies.

When examining recent return game stats, Choinski has secured 43.8% of points on his opponent's second serve, whereas Wayenburg leads with 46.62%. For first serve return points, Choinski stands at 27.1%, marginally ahead of Wayenburg's 26.25%. Such statistics are heavily weighted in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup. Over the last year, Choinski has a lower win rate of 50.79% (32 wins, 31 losses) compared to Wayenburg's 56.58% (43 wins, 33 losses), providing a comprehensive overview favoring Wayenburg.

Choinski's career best win percentage is on clay, boasting a 63% success rate (216 wins, 129 losses), while grass is his weakest surface with just 17% success (3 wins, 15 losses). Conversely, Wayenburg excels on indoor hard courts, achieving a win rate of 62% (69 wins, 43 losses), with his least effective performance on regular hard courts at 56% (41 wins, 32 losses). These surface preferences could play a crucial role in the outcome depending on the tournament's surface.

In the past year, Choinski has frequently competed in Challengers and ITF tournaments over $10K, where he has won 52.08% of his matches (25 wins, 23 losses). Wayenburg, meanwhile, has often participated in Futures/Satellites and ITF tournaments at $10K, claiming victory in 60.47% of his games (26 wins, 17 losses). This differential highlights a slight edge in consistency for Wayenburg at the level of competition each has faced.

Choinski has encountered opponents with an average rank of 237.68 over the last 12 months, a tier considerably higher compared to Wayenburg's average opponent rank of 454.37. This element distinctly favors Choinski, showcasing his experience against more challenging competitors. If the match extends to a deciding set, Choinski has a 50% win record in such scenarios over the past year, whereas Wayenburg has a marginally lower win rate of 47% in deciding sets.

Regarding break point conversion in recent form, Choinski has effectively converted 35.4% of his opportunities, surpassing Wayenburg's 31.46% conversion rate. This statistic offers valuable insights for potential live betting scenarios. Based on these comprehensive statistics, Wayenburg emerges as the predicted victor due to slightly better current form and overall match success, despite Choinski's experience against tougher opponents and slightly better break point dynamics. The match's outcome will ultimately hinge on both players' ability to capitalize on these subtle differences.